Shines your shoes while you wait (not available in California)

Is this the best blog ever?

By Pixel at February 11, 2005 at 9:16 pm. Filed in administrative business

I think it just might. Let me know what you think before I start commenting all willy-nilly on myself.


| 2 Comments


Violating the Honor System

By Pixel at February 11, 2005 at 4:24 pm. Filed in commentary

Hey, you know what’s fun? Obscene and pornographic materials! They’re almost as fun as violence and discriminating based on race, sex, religion, nationality, disability, sexual orientation, or age. So let’s all do some illegal activities, while I help you gamble in the sweepstakes or lottery! All I need is your money or investment (so long as it is contrary to applicable law or rule). So, check out our new site: amzon.com, which is completely endorsed by Amazon.com!

–This jabbing was completely stolen from someone else’s webpage.


| 2 Comments


Testicles

By Pixel at February 11, 2005 at 3:17 pm. Filed in commentary

After reading George Carlo’s book (or at least seeing most of the icky pictures), you’d think that I would know better than to rest my cell phone next to my crotch… I don’t do a lot of things that people’d think.


| No Comments


Ode to Jenny

By Pixel at February 11, 2005 at 2:50 pm. Filed in commentary, odes


Dear Jenny Belle Werness,
Thank you for being such an excellent activist. Thank you for being so cute and possibly related to the head of the American Atheists that you won their scholarship. You’re probably going to spend that money on tuition, or fees, or books, or liquor, or perhaps just a giant bar of chocolate. Well, bully for you. Enjoy it while it lasts. Because I needed this scholarship, and now, thanks to you, I likely won’t have it. Now how am I going to pay for my International Student Exchange? Hopefully you have a plan, because I don’t. And you know what hurts the most? This quote:

“And so the scholarship applicants are chosen primarily on these aspects of activism. Did they bounce back from defeat, only to be victorious in a subsequent battle? Did they put a face on their activism, so people could see that the person behind the keyboard was a normal, likeable, and downright sensible person?”

Are they saying I’m a faceless, defeatist, abnormal, unlikeable, and unsensible person? Or am I reading too far into this? Perhaps I’m not reading far enough. I mean, this was for the 2004 scholarship and this year, if I’m correct, is 2005. Oh. Sorry Jenny. My bad. Disregard this message.

Love,


| No Comments


Page 1 of 11

Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^